2013年12月15日 星期日

iTunes great for Apple, but not for music biz - Technology - Electronics

When Apple rolled out iTunes for the ample in the mechanism of 2003, the music manufacturing was at a summit of conversion -- and confusion.Entering the up-to-the-minute millennium, albums were enjoying runaway success sales of a number of million units for its megastar artists, and profits were thriving. Yet the hazard of Napster and other forms of illegitimate downloading endangered to eviscerate those income as numerous harmony fans were opening to get used to the idea that music, and heaps of it, possibly will be free.Apple's iTunes entered into that landscape by means of a concept that wasn't exactly new-fangled: a system where you possibly will pay for songs online. Yet iTunes, with its undemanding interface, its uncomplicated thought -- 99 cents per song -- and ground-breaking MP3 tool, the iPod, completed it the blonde standard.The entry of Apple and its person in charge, Steve Jobs, who died Wednesday, into the composition world was supplementary than a success -- it was a observable fact. Today, iTunes is the largest music retailer, has redefined the listening knowledge and has largely become the way that composition is consumed.What's less clear is how a large amount the music manufacturing -- which is long-lasting to turn down -- has benefited. Even these days, accord is mixed."It really did be reminiscent an complete industry, and gave a cue to even a culture away from the engineering with the intent of if you provided music in a convenient, direct way and responded to the consumers' interest and demands, they would in sequence buy it, in particular if it was priced suitably," said James Diener, CEO and leader of A&M/Octone proceedings."It forced change in a constructive way. People who are stable of what iTunes may have done perchance have dumpy reminiscences and don't become conscious that the substitute at the time was that an massive amount of music was leaking onto the Internet and organism obsessive for without charge," Die ner added. "The substitute was to encourage community to pay money for music, and to go to a digital put on the market site. That was a amazing step frontward."Apple introduced iTunes in 2001, a few months earlier than it would discharge the now-everywhere iPod (which begat the iPod Nano, the iPhone, the iPad). At the point in time, it was not a music store but a rip-and-flame documentation scrutinize only existing for Mac users. It initially was viewed with immense skepticism by documentation companies for its capability to make digital copies of harmony -- incredible the manufacturing consideration would lead to piracy.The manufacturing had a lot to look after. It was enjoying flourishing sales at the go round of the preceding century, fueled by the accomplishment of teen impression like Britney Spears, the side street Boys and 'N Sync. But it was just starting to feel the property of the illegal downloading era: The top-selling photograph photograph album of that year, L inkin Park's "Hybrid Theory," sold 4.8 million, down from 2000s top-seller, 'N Sync's "No Strings emotionally caught up," which sold almost 8 million a year earlier than."That was at the identical time we were confronting Napster, we were confronting the beginnings of the intercontinental piracy outbreak with the intention of was to come up to," said Jim Donio, leader of the National Association of video recording Merchandisers, or NARM."At the identical split second of time, we were also experiencing the principal weekly sales of all moment. It was a exceedingly odd flowing together of proceedings, for the reason that you had the forerunner of enormous challenges, but at the same time, reaping the pillage of incredible record contravention mental sales. It was impassioned, it was tense."



???????

沒有留言:

張貼留言